Science Polished

• About
• Services
• Pricing
• Contact
• Recent Work
• Blog

Blog

Why clear communication in environmental science mattersAs a science editor and communicator specializing in environmental research, I help researchers, organizations, and companies transform complex findings into compelling narratives that resonate with their audiences. Issues like climate change, dwindling ecosystems and deforestation capture public interest but often seem abstract and distant. Environmental science is complex, making it easy to misinterpret or miscommunicate research findings. While many major environmental reports, like those from the IPCC, are available to the public, their technical wording and data-heavy figures make them hard to understand. Meanwhile, easy internet access provides a constant stream of environmental information at our fingertips, but not all of it is created equal. That’s why clear and accurate communication of environmental science and technology is more important than ever. Clear communication transforms knowledge into action.When science is misinterpreted:
Complex environmental research, written only for other experts, falls prey to misinterpretation and distortion. Climate change presents one particularly troubling case that still casts a shadow over public trust in climate science. Historically, the world’s climate has always changed, forcing ecosystems to adapt for survival. Present climate change, however, is different. It is driven by human activity, like fossil fuel burning, and happens at rates so fast that our ecosystems struggle to adapt. Climate scientists have warned us of the perils of human-driven climate change for decades. Yet, their work has often faced unfair scrutiny with some people viewing it as a mere natural phenomenon or a problem for the distant future. In 2009, the ‘Climategate’ scandal added fuel to the fire as climate change sceptics cherry-picked hacked data from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit, wrongly accusing scientists of manipulating climate data. This misinterpretation spread like wildfire and severely impacted public trust in climate science. This is why environmental experts must fight for public engagement with clear narratives and emotional resonance.When science communication fails to connect emotionally:
Humans are hard-wired to share stories and engage with topics that trigger our emotions. Most of us know that environmental science and technology strives to protect, restore and improve the planet. But if that work is communicated in overly technical terms, it fails to capture our attention and remains in our periphery. While this seems harmless, it can be detrimental to causes that require societal change. On the other hand, if we understand the symptoms of an issue it resonates with us more and we are urged to take collective action. For example, it is easy to ignore heavy and overwhelming stats about plastic pollution. Knowing that we are consuming toxic microplastics in our food and water because of our excessive use of plastics is, however, less easy to ignore. This switch in narrative is more likely to reduce public use of plastics, most people find the idea of eating plastics quite unappetising. When we turn emotionally flat statistics and data into emotional, but accurate, narratives we make people care.Clarity builds trust, support and action:
Clear communication does not just serve as interesting stories or pretty pictures; it serves to build trust and make change. When experts clarify their results well, they convince politicians to change policy. When we paint exciting pictures of nature to children, we encourage them to care for their environment, e.g., by not littering. When we write emotionally driven and convincing proposals we bring funding to areas in need of funding. This is where skilled editing, carefully chosen schematics and well curated figures become invaluable, where clarity emerges and strong stories take shape. By making it our responsibility to communicate thoughtfully, we encourage media to share our intended message, and public support follows. Translating complex ideas into accessible, accurate and emotionally resonant communication must never be an afterthought.How experts can improve communication:
Figures and schematics are generally great methods to provide information if, that is, they are high quality and simple. During my undergraduate degree, I learned that good figures provide one or two key findings, and need little to no text. One of my PhD supervisors once told me that a well written science paper or report takes the reader by the hand and guides them through the story. And many colleagues, peers and authors have taught me that first drafts are for us, not our audience. To achieve true clarity, we must reshape our work into easily digestible and completely unambiguous messages. Furthermore, each nugget of information must be moulded to its specific audience. The best kind of communication is not entitled and does not expect the reader to read between the lines. Every researcher, every organization, every company working in environmental science and technology has the power to shape public understanding and drive action. The question isn't whether your work matters, it's whether you'll communicate it in a way that makes people care. And you can start today.If you want to start to improve your science communication today, here are some resources I recommend:• Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded by Joshua Schimel – A guide to telling stories in science, from the larger scope to technical detail
• The Sense of Style by Steven Pinker - A scientist's guide to clear, engaging writing
• Don't Be Such a Scientist by Randy Olson - How to connect science with narrative and emotion
• The Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science - Workshops and training programs

• Top

Contact

Contact Form: Let's work together!

• Top

• Email
• LinkedIn
• ResearchGate

© 2025 Danielle Rushworth · All rights reserved
sciencepolished.com
[email protected]